Paul Krugman’s article [free registration required] in today’s New York Times takes a quick swipe at New Jersey’s former Gov. Whitman before redirecting his attack on BushCo.™* The article is terse and devoid of detail, but sums up the situation pretty well. Here’s an excerpt:
The only reason Tennessee doesn’t look like Argentina right now is that it isn’t a sovereign nation; since the federal budget was in good shape until recently, there’s a safety net. And the federal budget was in pretty good shape because the Clinton administration, unlike state governments, behaved responsibly. Budget projections were honest—if anything, too cautious—and boom-year surpluses were used to reduce debt.
On another note entirely, here’s a great page of Linguistics Fun. Enjoy.
NP: more radioio—Midnight Oil, Say Your Prayers
WELCOME TO JOKEOFALLTRADES (JoAT) v2.2!!
I’ve finally done it. I’ve gotten rid of that horrid page I designed three months ago and have replaced it with something slightly less horrid. I hope you like it. At least, I hope you dislike it less than the last version. Over the next few days, I’ll convert the rest of the site to conform to the new format, with a few additional changes in places to keep things lively. Oh, I do hope you like it!
JoAT v2.2 offers the following advantages over its predecessor:
- It looks prettier
- It’s more customizable
- It’s easier to maintain
- It makes me happier
I don’t know if you care about any of that, but I certainly do. And since I’m probably the only person who reads this page, I’m the one I care about. However, JoAT v2.2 now also features comments from readers, should there be any readers of a disposition for making comments. At any rate, readers now have the ability to leave comments, whereas before they were silenced by my authoritarian access restrictions. Links are at the bottom of each update. Comment away.
If you absolutely must use the old page, I offer you a last look here. However, JoAT v2.1 is no longer supported, so use at your own risk. Caveat Emptor.
While I was riding the city bus home yesterday, a man boarded the bus holding a newspaper close in front of his face. He proceeded to walk down the aisle to the back of the bus, using the newspaper to prevent anyone from noting the features of his face. He sat down in the last seat, slid into the corner, and continued to hide his face. And that’s when I noticed them: video cameras had been placed in the bus at regular intervals along the ceiling. He was hiding from them. I saw his face briefly as he slid the window closed—no disfigurement, nothing to hide, except the details of his identity. I don’t know why, but the mere suggestion of criminality made my skin crawl. I have never wanted to be somewhere else so desperately as I did yesterday sitting on that bus. I exchanged furtive glances with other passengers, who seemed equally disturbed by the man’s behavior. When we reached my stop, I carefully noted the man’s clothing, height, build, the headline of the newspaper page he had not turned for the entire ride, every possible detail I could imagine being questioned about in the aftermath of some horrible event. I got off the bus, noted the bus number, and walked home, relieved. I survived another day in this forsaken town, but just barely, I’m sure of it.
NP: radioio streaming radio, .wma 128K
Okay, so I’m getting a bit tired of hearing people’s uninformed reactions to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding the Pledge of Allegiance. If you haven’t actually read the opinion, then chances are that you have no idea about whether Judges Goodwin and Reinhardt were correct. The media certainly haven’t reported well, and the almighty Senators and Representatives in Washington seem equally uninformed. Please, people, if you’re going to spout off about somebody being wrong, make sure you know what it is they’ve actually said. Tobias Wolff discusses the matter rather clearly.
I say this without stating my own opinion on the ruling.
On a related note, shortly after the Circuit court decision was announced, a bill was introduced in the US Senate (S2690, passed 99-0) to “reaffirm the reference to one Nation under God in the Pledge of Allegiance.” The only Senator not to vote in favor was Jesse Helms (R-NC), who missed the vote for health reasons. Of special note is finding 16 in section 1 of the bill:
(16) The erroneous rationale of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Newdow would lead to the absurd result that the Constitution’s use of the express religious reference “Year of our Lord” in Article VII violates the First Amendment to the Constitution, and that, therefore, a school district’s policy and practice of teacher-led voluntary recitations of the Constitution itself would be unconstitutional.
This is an insidious, intentional misreading of the 9th Circuit ruling, which specifically acknowledges a distinction between the Pledge, taken as a whole, and the 1954 Act, the sole purpose of which was to introduce the words “under God” into the Pledge so schoolchildren would “daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our Nation and our people to the Almighty.” (statement of Sen. Ferguson incorporating signing statement of President Eisenhower, 100 Cong. Rec. 8618, 1954). Judge Goodwin writes:
The flaw in defendants’ argument is that it looks at the text of the Pledge “as a whole,” and glosses over the 1954 Act. The problem with this approach is apparent when one considers the [Supreme] Court’s analysis in Wallace. There, the Court struck down Alabama’s statute mandating a moment of silence for “meditation or voluntary prayer” not because the final version “as a whole” lacked a primary secular purpose, but because the state legislature had amended the statute specifically and solely to add the words “or voluntary prayer.” 472 U.S. at 59–60.
Those are your elected representatives, folks. They criticize a ruling they haven’t read. Sure, it was a great opportunity for Republicans to ride the wave of patriotism to political success, and for Democrats to suck the wind from Republican sails. But not one Senator in the land bothered to offer a simple, “Well, the decision was consistent with previous Supreme Court rulings…” or even just a, “Oh, lets not be so hasty to condemn a ruling we haven’t read… let us read it first, then condemn it.” Nope. They’re no better than the yahoos on the street whose knee-jerk reactions to the ruling is mirrored so well by those in the Senate—truly, government of the people by the people…. For the Senators, though, unreflective unfurling of the sails to catch the public’s political gale is a bit more dangerous. It is easy to lose course in stormy weather. Unfortunately, getting things right doesn’t matter a whit to any of our Senators when it might conflict with getting votes. God Bless the USA.
NP: DangerMouse sound clips
