{"id":22,"date":"2002-07-11T15:45:18","date_gmt":"2002-07-11T23:45:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jokeofalltrades.com\/root\/archives\/2002\/07\/11\/is-the-pledge-unconstitutional\/"},"modified":"2025-10-19T09:41:10","modified_gmt":"2025-10-19T15:41:10","slug":"is-the-pledge-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/2002\/07\/11\/is-the-pledge-unconstitutional\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the Pledge unconstitutional?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nOkay, so I&#8217;m getting a bit tired of hearing people&#8217;s uninformed reactions to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding the Pledge of Allegiance. If you haven&#8217;t actually read the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.findlaw.com\/usatoday\/docs\/conlaw\/newdowus62602opn.pdf\">opinion<\/a>, then chances are that you have no idea about whether Judges Goodwin and Reinhardt were correct. The media certainly haven&#8217;t reported well, and the almighty Senators and Representatives in Washington seem equally uninformed. Please, people, if you&#8217;re going to spout off about somebody being wrong, make sure you know what it is they&#8217;ve actually said. Tobias Wolff <a href=\"http:\/\/writ.corporate.findlaw.com\/commentary\/20020702_wolff.html\">discusses the matter<\/a> rather clearly.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nI say this without stating my own opinion on the ruling.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nOn a related note, shortly after the Circuit court decision was announced, a <a href=\"http:\/\/frwebgate.access.gpo.gov\/cgi-bin\/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_bills&amp;docid=f:s2690is.txt\">bill was introduced in the US Senate<\/a> (S2690, passed 99-0) to &#8220;reaffirm the reference to one Nation under God in the Pledge of Allegiance.&#8221; The only Senator not to vote in favor was Jesse Helms (R-NC), who missed the vote for health reasons. Of special note is finding 16 in section 1 of the bill:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>(16) The erroneous rationale of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Newdow would lead to the absurd result that the Constitution&#8217;s use of the express religious reference &#8220;Year of our Lord&#8221; in Article VII violates the First Amendment to the Constitution, and that, therefore, a school district&#8217;s policy and practice of teacher-led voluntary recitations of the Constitution itself would be unconstitutional.\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\nThis is an insidious, intentional misreading of the 9th Circuit ruling, which specifically acknowledges a distinction between the Pledge, taken as a whole, and the 1954 Act, the sole purpose of which was to introduce the words &#8220;under God&#8221; into the Pledge so schoolchildren would &#8220;daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our Nation and our people to the Almighty.&#8221; (statement of Sen. Ferguson incorporating signing statement of President Eisenhower, 100 Cong. Rec. 8618, 1954). Judge Goodwin writes:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\nThe flaw in defendants&#8217; argument is that it looks at the text of the Pledge &#8220;as a whole,&#8221; and glosses over the 1954 Act. The problem with this approach is apparent when one considers the [Supreme] Court&#8217;s analysis in <i>Wallace<\/i>. There, the Court struck down Alabama&#8217;s statute mandating a moment of silence for &#8220;meditation or voluntary prayer&#8221; not because the final version &#8220;as a whole&#8221; lacked a primary secular purpose, but because the state legislature had amended the statute specifically and solely to add the words &#8220;or voluntary prayer.&#8221; 472 U.S. at 59&#8211;60.\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\nThose are your elected representatives, folks. They criticize a ruling they haven&#8217;t read. Sure, it was a great opportunity for Republicans to ride the wave of patriotism to political success, and for Democrats to suck the wind from Republican sails. But <em>not one<\/em> Senator in the land bothered to offer a simple, &#8220;Well, the decision was consistent with previous Supreme Court rulings&#8230;&#8221; or even just a, &#8220;Oh, lets not be so hasty to condemn a ruling we haven&#8217;t read&#8230; let us read it first, then condemn it.&#8221; Nope. They&#8217;re no better than the yahoos on the street whose knee-jerk reactions to the ruling is mirrored so well by those in the Senate&#8212;truly, government of the people <em>by<\/em> the people&#8230;. For the Senators, though, unreflective unfurling of the sails to catch the public&#8217;s political gale is a bit more dangerous. It is easy to lose course in stormy weather. Unfortunately, getting things <em>right<\/em> doesn&#8217;t matter a whit to <em>any<\/em> of our Senators when it might conflict with getting votes. God Bless the USA.\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"np\">NP: <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Danger_Mouse_(1981_TV_series)\">DangerMouse<\/a> sound clips<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Okay, so I&#8217;m getting a bit tired of hearing people&#8217;s uninformed reactions to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding the Pledge of Allegiance. If you haven&#8217;t actually read the opinion, then chances are that you have no idea about whether Judges Goodwin and Reinhardt were correct. The media certainly haven&#8217;t reported well, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":191,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22\/revisions\/191"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelhoke.name\/oldblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}